| [Inquire here for advertising information] |
| Fantasy Baseball and Football News Center |
|
Fantasy Sports Home Fantasy Baseball Fantasy Baseball Player News Gary Sheffield (OF), NYY
|
|
Gary Sheffield (OF), NYYFantasy Baseball Player News |
|
|
Copyright © 2002-2005 Fantasy Information Central. All rights reserved. Site Map :: Privacy Policy :: Advertising |
(he played 3B, sometimes)
It's a good point though. I still don't think the Yankees need Sheff for 2007 though, so picking up his option is a bad idea. Melky Cabrera has done a good enough job to get a starting job next year, whether it be in the OF or at DH.
It's a good point though. I still don't think the Yankees need Sheff for 2007 though, so picking up his option is a bad idea. Melky Cabrera has done a good enough job to get a starting job next year, whether it be in the OF or at DH.
It's a good point though. I still don't think the Yankees need Sheff for 2007 though, so picking up his option is a bad idea. Melky Cabrera has done a good enough job to get a starting job next year, whether it be in the OF or at DH.
If it's such an obvious point, then why all the talk of putting Sheffield on first? And how have you already ranked Sheffield as only being slightly worse than Giambi at first base?
It's a good point though. I still don't think the Yankees need Sheff for 2007 though, so picking up his option is a bad idea. Melky Cabrera has done a good enough job to get a starting job next year, whether it be in the OF or at DH.
If it's such an obvious point, then why all the talk of putting Sheffield on first? And how have you already ranked Sheffield as only being slightly worse than Giambi at first base?
It's a good point though. I still don't think the Yankees need Sheff for 2007 though, so picking up his option is a bad idea. Melky Cabrera has done a good enough job to get a starting job next year, whether it be in the OF or at DH.
If it's such an obvious point, then why all the talk of putting Sheffield on first? And how have you already ranked Sheffield as only being slightly worse than Giambi at first base?
It's a good point though. I still don't think the Yankees need Sheff for 2007 though, so picking up his option is a bad idea. Melky Cabrera has done a good enough job to get a starting job next year, whether it be in the OF or at DH.
If it's such an obvious point, then why all the talk of putting Sheffield on first? And how have you already ranked Sheffield as only being slightly worse than Giambi at first base?
There's one question I have: if this is such an obvious fact that Giambi should play 1B and Sheffield at DH, why is there all this talk about putting Sheff at first?
There's one question I have: if this is such an obvious fact that Giambi should play 1B and Sheffield at DH, why is there all this talk about putting Sheff at first?
Come on, haven't you played 1B after breaking your wrists? I doubt you have even played baseball at all.
So now that we agree with each other, that Giambi should play first and Sheffield should DH, there's no point in arguing anymore.
So now that we agree with each other, that Giambi should play first and Sheffield should DH, there's no point in arguing anymore.
Sheff seriously should just sit out, you can never rush back a wrist injury, especially with the possibility of breaking it again this year.
So now that we agree with each other, that Giambi should play first and Sheffield should DH, there's no point in arguing anymore.
Sheff seriously should just sit out, you can never rush back a wrist injury, especially with the possibility of breaking it again this year.
It's fun arguing with someone you agree with? This is just a stab in the dark, but do you find work to be enjoyable?
So now that we agree with each other, that Giambi should play first and Sheffield should DH, there's no point in arguing anymore.
Sheff seriously should just sit out, you can never rush back a wrist injury, especially with the possibility of breaking it again this year.
It's fun arguing with someone you agree with? This is just a stab in the dark, but do you find work to be enjoyable?
I agree with you.