Fantasy Football and Fantasy Baseball News [Inquire here for advertising information]
    Fantasy Baseball and Football News Center    
Add FantasyInfoCentral.com to My Yahoo! FantasyInfoCentral.com XML FeedBookmark FantasyInfoCentral.com
Quick Links
Fantasy Sports Search Search
 

FREE Dish Network Satellite TV!
[Support our sponsors]
Password:
Auto Log-in:
Not a member?
Register here

Fantasy Info Central General



FIC Newsletter
Stay ahead of the curve with our FREE fantasy sports newsletter!
» Exclusive articles
» Pre-launch features

Emails are always kept strictly confidential.


Prospect Alert
Fantasy Baseball Sleepers

Columnist: Koby Schellenger

Sytems Audit: Kansas City Royals
October 15, 2006

Systems Audit:
Kansas City Royals

1. Alex Gordon, 3B, AA. Gordon could be the top player in the minors. He's got power, patience and speed. There's not much more to say except if you didn't know who this guy is until now, you have a lot of studying to do.
2. Billy Butler, OF, AA. Butler and Gordon could very well have been 1a and 1b. They are very very close. Gordon has better numbers but is two years older. Butler has defensive issues and may project better as a DH but that won't matter when he's hitting .310/.410/.530. He projects as a power hitter with patience to boot.
3. Luke Hochevar, RHP, A. He'll probably be moved to AA or AAA to start the year. But don't be fooled by front office talk, this guy has a spot in Kansas City in 2007. He's worth all the attention he gets. Dominant pitcher who knows how to handle himself on the mound and knows how to beat opposing hitters.
4. Justin Huber, 1B, AAA. Above average OBP and ISOP numbers validate Huber's numbers more than anything else. He has a tremdous ability to find pitches he wants to hit and then hit them or wait out the pitcher. He began to discover as pitching gets better you can't always wait them out. He made the adjustments necessary and now just needs to carry that over to the big leagues.
5. Chris Lubanski, CF, AA. Lubanski was the third member of a dynamite offense in Wichita this year. He has some power but a good eye at the plate. Do you see a trend? The Royals have worked hard to develop patient batters and it's beginning to pay off. In 2005 he showed the ability to hit the ball for power and in 2006 KC asked him to just get on base and he responded well taking walks at double the rate he's done the rest of his career. He has speed though the Royals have been reluctant to turn him loose with Butler and Gordon hitting behind him.
6. Jeffery Bianchi, SS, Rk. Bianchi would likely be rated higher in most systems, but this is the creme de la creme. He has a good eye, great power potential, great speed and won't strikeout a lot. He's a prototypical #2 hitter.
7. Mitch Maier, CF, AA. Maier will move to RF yielding to Chris Lubanski. Maier isn't a long term solution at COF for most teams but this is the Royals. He doesn't take many walks and doesn't hit for much power, but he does hit for good average and has the speed to beat out infield hits, stretch singles into doubles and go from first to third on a lazy single.
8. Chris Nicoll, RHP, A+. One word to describe Nicoll is control. He doesn't give many free passes and doesn't give up many hits. He's more of a groundball pitcher and does a great job keeping everything down. When he doesn't, he gets in trouble. He needs to work on consistency but he's got a bright future and a fasttrack to the bigs in the KC system.
9. Chris McConnell, SS, A. McConnell is an athlete with lots of raw skill. Guys like him take time to develop and can't be rushed. He has lots to learn about batting but he has plenty of time to learn it as he's only 20 years old.
10. Angel Sanchez, SS, AA. Sanchez doesn't strikeout and doesn't walk. He has little power and is a total free swinger. That means he's probably going to be a part time player, at best. Combine his offense with his above average defense and you have someone who just doesn't have what it takes to be an everyday player but could find a nice role as a pinch hitter in KC.
Flier. Luis Cota, RHP, A+. He's a work in progress. Tons of potential just hasn't been able to put it together.

Future Lineup (arrival date)
C: John Buck
1B: Ryan Shealy
2B: Esteban German
3B: Alex Gordon (2007)
SS: Jeffery Bianchi (2010) (Berroa or Sanchez until then)
LF: Billy Butler (2007)
CF: Chris Lubanski (2007)
RF: Mitch Maier (2008)
DH: Justin Huber (2007)

Starting Pitching
1. Luke Hochevar (2007)
2. Zack Greinke
3. Chris Nicoll (2009)
4. Luke Hudson
5. Jorge De La Rosa

Bullpen
Closer: Joe Nelson
Setup: Ambroix Burgos, Ryan Z. Braun
Middle Relief: Odalis Perez, Runelvys Hernandez, Joel Peralta


The Kansas City Royals have a deep, deep, deep system. But it's all in position players. They have a solid core of young players and their future lineup will be all but carved in stone by the All Star Break next year. Pitching on the other hand is downright terrible. Hochevar is a legitimate ace in my mind. At least for Kansas City. They'll need to sign or trade for some pithing as they dumped their best (at the time) pitching prospect (JP Howell) for Joey Gathright (not in the long term plan) but trading anyone else is a longshot. KC has implimented a system for developing hitters based on plate discipline and they will begin to see the fruits of that labor in 2007 at the major league level. Don't count out the AA clan from 2006 if they don't make the ML roster out of the gates. The Royals have said they won't rush them, and they shouldn't, but you can't keep a good prospect down.

System Grade: A


Posted by Koby Schellenger: Oct 15 at 7:54 PM

 Comment on Sytems Audit: Kansas City Royalsforum

» Log in or register to comment and for free site-wide access.
Comments
[1] by maddirishman on 10/15/2006 11:05 pmreply
Good job. The Royals are going to be fun to watch in the next few years. One guy you missed was Tyler Lumsden. He projects into the middle of the rotation maybe as soon as '07. He pitched well for Wichita after arrival.

In my opinion a rotation of Perez, Hudson, Greinke, Hochevar and Lumsden starting the season would be fun to watch. It would be several magnitudes better than what the team started with in '06.
[2] by rice on 10/15/2006 11:32 pmreply
maddirishman wrote:
Good job. The Royals are going to be fun to watch in the next few years.


thats what we said a few years ago.
[3] by maddirishman on 10/16/2006 01:24 amreply
Yes, but at that time there was no real owner or Glass had just taken over. I think he would admit to making many mistakes, but I also think he learns from his mistakes.
[4] by guru4u on 10/16/2006 04:31 amreply
Nice work Koby.

I am surprised at how far out you project Bianchi from reaching the majors. I like this kid a lot myself, and you're right in stating he's a legit 2 hitter for what should be a pretty potent offense in a few years. I guess I was expecting him to be in the lineup by 2009, figuring he'll start in Low-A ball this year, get moved up to High-A by year's end, then start 2008 in AA. I guess it all depends on how his bat progresses.
[5] by kschellenger on 10/16/2006 05:53 amreply
maddirishman wrote:
Good job. The Royals are going to be fun to watch in the next few years. One guy you missed was Tyler Lumsden. He projects into the middle of the rotation maybe as soon as '07. He pitched well for Wichita after arrival.

In my opinion a rotation of Perez, Hudson, Greinke, Hochevar and Lumsden starting the season would be fun to watch. It would be several magnitudes better than what the team started with in '06.


Thank you. Lumsden doesn't fit in my top ten because I just don't think he has the ceiling the other guys have. He's a nice player but doesn't have a lot of room to improve. Certainly he's not ready to start in the bigs next year but could possibly work his way up by the end of the year. We'll see soon enough.
[6] by kschellenger on 10/16/2006 05:55 amreply
guru4u wrote:
Nice work Koby.

I am surprised at how far out you project Bianchi from reaching the majors. I like this kid a lot myself, and you're right in stating he's a legit 2 hitter for what should be a pretty potent offense in a few years. I guess I was expecting him to be in the lineup by 2009, figuring he'll start in Low-A ball this year, get moved up to High-A by year's end, then start 2008 in AA. I guess it all depends on how his bat progresses.


Thanks. Everything I've heard about Bianchi, and seen, is that his raw skill is going to take some time to develop. If the Royals are going to honestly stick to their policy of not rushing prospects, as I believe they will, he'll have to wait, but he is still very young so there's no denying he could be ready sooner.
[7] by dpaullin on 10/16/2006 06:11 amreply
The Royals also have a good GM who knows a lot about player development. He must've come from a good organization that cares a lot about player development.

[8] by kschellenger on 10/16/2006 06:12 amreply
dpaullin wrote:
The Royals also have a good GM who knows a lot about player development. He must've come from a good organization that cares a lot about player development.



I think you're right about that. Hmm...If I could only remember which orgainization that was...
[9] by DOH!!! on 10/16/2006 06:51 amreply
I can't wait to see Butler and Gordon's skills next season and of course Luke Hochevar.

[10] by Whistler on 10/16/2006 07:00 amreply
How does Hochevar stack up against some of the other well known pitchers in the minors?

Presumably behind the likes of Bailey, Hughes, Gallardo, Pelfry, both Millers; but is he someone who should move up that board to sit near those guys?

Leads me to another question about player projection not for this thread... (I'll post seperately)

thanks
[11] by kschellenger on 10/16/2006 12:13 pmreply
Whistler wrote:
How does Hochevar stack up against some of the other well known pitchers in the minors?

Presumably behind the likes of Bailey, Hughes, Gallardo, Pelfry, both Millers; but is he someone who should move up that board to sit near those guys?

Leads me to another question about player projection not for this thread... (I'll post seperately)

thanks


Hochevar is an excellent pitching prospect. He ranks behind the guys you mentioned but not too far. I think I ranked him 35th overall which would be at the top of the second tier pitching prospects, essentially. He's just more refined than the other guys he's around in my rankings like Inman, Adenhart, Lincecum and Rodgers.
[12] by maddirishman on 10/17/2006 12:40 amreply
I don't think Lumsden will be a #1 starter either, but my understanding is that they project him in at about a #3. I would rank him in at about #8 on your list.

As for Bianchi, he has to stay healthy. He has been injured in both of his first two seasons. There is no doubting the talent level.

Sure is nice to see the interest in the Royals. Has been kind of quiet around here.
[13] by guru4u on 10/17/2006 01:00 amreply
maddirishman wrote:
Sure is nice to see the interest in the Royals. Has been kind of quiet around here.


Lol. The only real interest is in the farm system. There are not many farm systems I would rather have over the Royals'. Tampa is one I can think of, and both LA teams have decent arguements as well. Arizona graduated most of its really good talent. San Fran has the polar opposite of the Royals. They have great pitching, but not much offense. Combine the two, and you would have an unstoppable force


Article Tools
Contact Koby Schellenger
Email this article
Print this article
Sign up for notification when updated:
Prospect Alert
Subscribe
Unsubscribe

Add Prospect Alert to My Yahoo! | Prospect Alert XML Feed
Latest "Prospect Alert" Entries
» Systems Audit: Atlanta Braves
» Systems Audit: Texas Rangers
» Systems Audit: Seattle Mariners
» Systems Audit: Philadelphia Phillies
» Systems Audit: LA Angels
» Systems Audit: Oakland Athletics
» Systems Audit: Minnesota Twins
» Sytems Audit: Kansas City Royals
» Systems Audit: Detroit Tigers
» Systems Audit: Cleveland Indians


» View archives
Recent Message Board Discussions
Visit the message board! Visit the message board

Bookmark
» Bookmark FIC
Syndication
Syndicate this site (XML)
Syndication Form
Contact Us
Send Us Your Feedback





  Copyright © 2002-2005 Fantasy Information Central. All rights reserved.
  Site Map :: Privacy Policy :: Advertising