In the past two weeks, we've looked at two of the bigger factors that led to how a ballpark played... home runs yielded and batting average yielded. Today, we'll change things up a bit and go with one of the factors that gets a little less publicity, but is nearly as important. While not all parks are built for power hitting teams, there are ways that players can work around that. For instance, the number one hitter's park in baseball last season in terms of runs scored played as a neutral pitcher's park in terms of home runs. However, loading up with gap hitters who rack up the doubles can still lead to a ton of runs being put on the board.
Traditionally, the top doubles park in baseball has been Fenway, which is largely due to that 37 foot monster out in left field. While the fence is incredibly short in distance, its height will keep any line drive from even coming close to leaving the yard, bouncing it back into play. This leads to a ton of runners ending up on second base out of the batter's box. It's no surprise that Fenway, which played negatively in home runs for the Red Sox in each of the past three seasons, led our survey in all three of those years.
Other parks consistently playing near the top of our rankings
PNC Park (Pittsburgh) - Like Fenway, PNC played negatively for home runs in each of the past three seasons, though it finished 2nd (2006), 5th (2005), and 9th (2004) in terms of doubles yielded in Pirate games as compared to their road games. The fences aren't particularly long down the lines or in centerfield, though they are a little longer in the power alleys than most stadiums (389 to left center and 375 to right center).
Kaufmann Stadium (Kansas City) - While Kaufmann actually played poorly for doubles in 2004, that was its first season since moving the fences back. Hitters (both Royals' hitters and their opponents) seem to have figured out that it's better not to swing for the fences so often there in the past two years. Kaufmann has held steady as the number three park in terms of doubles yielded the past two seasons, making it a fantastic plus play for the Magglio Ordonez' and Joe Mauer's of the world when they come to town.
Chase Field (Arizona) - While Chase differs from each of the three parks above because it also plays well for home runs, it's easy to figure out why it plays well for doubles. It's a pull-hitter's dream down the lines, with fairly short (both distance and height) fences in those areas. However, it's canyonous in the gaps. The power alleys run out at 413 feet, while dead center is actually a tad shorter at 407. Toss in a huge fence out in center field, and you're talking about a lot of doubles being hit in the gap. The Diamondbacks are building their team very well for the future, as Chad Tracy, Conor Jackson, Stephen Drew, and Carlos Quentin all figure as young players that love to drive the ball into the gap.
Parks that have consistently played poorly
Comerica Park (Detroit) - It's kind of baffling that Comerica hasn't played better to doubles in recent years. The dimensions (particularly in left and center field) would imply that it would play considerably better for doubles than home runs. However, it hasn't played well for much of anything in the past three seasons, as it's played 24th (2006), 21st (2005), and 27th (2004) in doubles.
Petco Park (San Diego) - Yet another park that hasn't played well in any area, Petco really isn't that deep with its dimensions. It's very shallow (322) down the right field line and fairly shallow in left (334) and left center (367). Center and right center field are actually pretty much right at the league average. This doesn't leave as much room in the gaps as you might think, and Petco has played horribly for doubles in each of its three seasons. It ranked dead last in 2006, 28th in 2005, and 22nd in 2004. On the positive side, it did start playing considerably better for home runs last season, ranking at just a -3 as compared to Padres' road games.
Tropicana Field (Tampa Bay) - Throw in 315 (left) and 322 (right) foot fences and people are gunning for the lines consistently. Toss in that the 370 in the gaps aren't remarkably long, and the Trop has played in the bottom ten in each of the past three seasons.
Yankee Stadium (New York) - People aren't lying when they talk about the short (314) right field porch, but they're completely missing that the left field porch is just 318 down the line in its own right. Hit it down the lines and you probably don't have to worry much about the fences in Yankee Stadium. The gaps play fairly deep, which would imply that it should play at least neutral for doubles, but it hasn't played better than 20th in the league in doubles in the past three seasons.
2006:
Rank
Team
Home
All. Home
Total Home
Road
All. Road
Total Road
Difference
1
Boston
186
204
390
141
144
285
105
2
Pittsburgh
161
166
327
125
134
259
68
3
Kansas City
177
191
368
158
150
308
60
4
Texas
191
149
340
166
134
300
40
5
Arizona
182
161
343
149
164
313
30
6
San Francisco
162
143
305
135
144
279
26
7
Chicago Cubs
150
134
284
121
142
263
21
8
Oakland
128
159
287
138
130
268
19
9
Philadelphia
151
168
319
143
167
310
9
10
Los Angeles
159
159
318
148
164
312
6
11
Toronto
187
135
322
161
156
317
5
12
Colorado
162
167
329
163
164
327
2
13
Houston
143
156
299
132
165
297
2
14
New York Mets
157
142
299
166
132
298
1
15
Atlanta
157
150
307
155
154
309
-2
16
Milwaukee
155
170
325
146
185
331
-6
17
Cleveland
179
140
319
172
153
325
-6
18
Florida
146
138
284
163
130
293
-9
19
Minnesota
132
138
270
143
142
285
-15
20
New York Yankees
155
147
302
172
147
319
-17
21
Anaheim
148
147
295
161
153
314
-19
22
Tampa Bay
129
161
290
138
173
311
-21
23
Cincinnati
129
171
300
162
161
323
-23
24
Detroit
132
135
267
162
128
290
-23
25
Chicago White
Sox
136
144
280
155
152
307
-27
26
Seattle
123
160
283
143
167
310
-27
27
Baltimore
137
131
268
151
155
306
-38
28
St. Louis
140
141
281
152
169
321
-40
29
Washington
143
147
290
179
158
337
-47
30
San Diego
118
126
244
180
138
318
-74
2005:
Rank
Team
Home
All. Home
Total Home
Road
All. Road
Total Road
Difference
1
Boston
191
203
394
148
151
299
95
2
Cincinnati
172
210
382
163
156
319
63
3
Kansas City
156
185
341
133
162
295
46
4
Colorado
155
184
339
125
173
298
41
5
Pittsburgh
162
163
325
130
159
289
36
6
Atlanta
168
145
313
140
140
280
33
7
Oakland
170
130
300
140
127
267
33
8
Philadelphia
144
172
316
138
147
285
31
9
Arizona
132
196
328
159
145
304
24
10
Toronto
166
129
295
141
134
275
20
11
Chicago Cubs
159
140
299
164
118
282
17
12
Cleveland
172
137
309
165
132
297
12
13
Texas
152
170
322
159
155
314
8
14
Anaheim
131
149
280
147
136
283
-3
15
Los Angeles
139
145
284
145
146
291
-7
16
Minnesota
131
127
258
138
130
268
-10
17
Seattle
141
132
273
148
135
283
-10
18
New York Mets
131
140
271
148
137
285
-14
19
Chicago White
Sox
124
131
255
129
147
276
-21
20
Washington
145
135
280
166
144
310
-30
21
Detroit
127
128
255
156
130
286
-31
22
San Francisco
143
135
278
156
153
309
-31
23
Tampa Bay
142
144
286
147
171
318
-32
24
New York Yankees
125
135
260
134
160
294
-34
25
Milwaukee
152
141
293
175
159
334
-41
26
Florida
135
148
283
171
158
329
-46
27
Baltimore
131
121
252
165
139
304
-52
28
San Diego
116
151
267
153
167
320
-53
29
Houston
123
116
239
158
143
301
-62
2004:
Rank
Team
Home
All. Home
Total Home
Road
All. Road
Total Road
Difference
1
Boston
218
177
395
155
141
296
99
2
Colorado
191
188
379
140
148
288
91
3
Milwaukee
161
174
335
134
151
285
50
4
San Francisco
168
163
331
146
147
293
38
5
Cleveland
184
176
360
161
162
323
37
6
Arizona
155
153
308
140
136
276
32
7
Texas
166
150
316
157
134
291
25
8
Toronto
148
156
304
142
137
279
25
9
Pittsburgh
130
160
290
137
135
272
18
10
Seattle
130
175
305
146
142
288
17
11
Baltimore
158
133
291
161
120
281
10
12
Chicago Cubs
148
132
280
160
113
273
7
13
Oakland
153
158
311
183
133
316
-5
14
Chicago White
Sox
136
141
277
148
135
283
-6
15
New York Mets
142
143
285
147
145
292
-7
16
Minnesota
156
118
274
154
129
283
-9
17
Atlanta
146
122
268
158
128
286
-18
18
Kansas City
115
184
299
146
177
323
-24
19
Florida
131
133
264
142
147
289
-25
20
Houston
139
133
272
155
150
305
-33
21
Tampa Bay
130
154
284
148
170
318
-34
22
San Diego
135
154
289
169
154
323
-34
23
New York Yankees
126
149
275
155
155
310
-35
24
Anaheim
119
145
264
153
153
306
-42
25
Philadelphia
144
144
288
159
174
333
-45
26
Cincinnati
130
176
306
157
197
354
-48
27
Detroit
117
142
259
167
149
316
-57
28
Los Angeles
101
107
208
125
148
273
-65
* The Washington Nationals moved into RFK Stadium prior to the 2005 season
** The St. Louis Cardinals moved into the new Busch Stadium prior to the 2006 season
No problem. I'm going to try and stick with something like this once a week throughout the year. We'll obviously run out of some of the "Ballpark Factors" that we're covering, such as how a park plays to, well, just about anything. However, I'll find something else that I can try and throw in that's going to be unique in this slot. Expect these articles every Tuesday or Wednesday throughout the year as part of On Deck.... we're also running our breakdowns of the upcoming weekly schedules, positional updates (cycling with different positions), and I have some other ideas on the way. They're all going to be broken down categorically in the side menu so that you can easily access the information you're after.
Great to hear that some of you are enjoying this, and feel free to spread the word!
Yea, Im pretty excited with everything thats going on. Its all pretty interesting. Im sure you guys have plenty of ideas to keep this going. One unique topic I was thinking about would be discussing weather, but that would take some extensive research...
Yea, Im pretty excited with everything thats going on. Its all pretty interesting. Im sure you guys have plenty of ideas to keep this going. One unique topic I was thinking about would be discussing weather, but that would take some extensive research...
I'm thinking he means wind patterns, cold vs. warm (a big key in how some parks, such as Wrigley Field, for example, play), things like that.
That would be a lot more difficult, though I'll consider seeing how much I can look into it. At the very least, it would be interesting as hell to put together. The big problem (at least comparatively with how I do the rest of the rankings) would be making sure that we're looking at equal home/road games and equal (or at least similar) competition when breaking it down by month, etc.
Part of what makes the system (based on the whole season) work is that teams generally (with the exception of their interleague opponents) will play the same competition at home as they will on the road. In other words, their pitchers will face the same (general) lineups at home and on the road and they'll usually face similar pitching. By using their home and road numbers vs. the same opposition, we're seeing how the park plays in comparison with how it plays against the same competition in other parks.
I'm thinking he means wind patterns, cold vs. warm (a big key in how some parks, such as Wrigley Field, for example, play), things like that.
That would be a lot more difficult, though I'll consider seeing how much I can look into it. At the very least, it would be interesting as hell to put together. The big problem (at least comparatively with how I do the rest of the rankings) would be making sure that we're looking at equal home/road games and equal (or at least similar) competition when breaking it down by month, etc.
Part of what makes the system (based on the whole season) work is that teams generally (with the exception of their interleague opponents) will play the same competition at home as they will on the road. In other words, their pitchers will face the same (general) lineups at home and on the road and they'll usually face similar pitching. By using their home and road numbers vs. the same opposition, we're seeing how the park plays in comparison with how it plays against the same competition in other parks.
Thats exactly what I mean... I wouldnt be surprised if you dug deep enough into MLB stats that you might stumble across some information regarding this topic.. With all the press towards the thin-air in Coors, one would start to think that teams have scouting reports on weather conditions all around the country and not just one stadium. Example: Like you mentioned, other parks have unique weather conce
Great to hear that some of you are enjoying this, and feel free to spread the word!
You mean dome vs. open games?
That would be a lot more difficult, though I'll consider seeing how much I can look into it. At the very least, it would be interesting as hell to put together. The big problem (at least comparatively with how I do the rest of the rankings) would be making sure that we're looking at equal home/road games and equal (or at least similar) competition when breaking it down by month, etc.
Part of what makes the system (based on the whole season) work is that teams generally (with the exception of their interleague opponents) will play the same competition at home as they will on the road. In other words, their pitchers will face the same (general) lineups at home and on the road and they'll usually face similar pitching. By using their home and road numbers vs. the same opposition, we're seeing how the park plays in comparison with how it plays against the same competition in other parks.
That would be a lot more difficult, though I'll consider seeing how much I can look into it. At the very least, it would be interesting as hell to put together. The big problem (at least comparatively with how I do the rest of the rankings) would be making sure that we're looking at equal home/road games and equal (or at least similar) competition when breaking it down by month, etc.
Part of what makes the system (based on the whole season) work is that teams generally (with the exception of their interleague opponents) will play the same competition at home as they will on the road. In other words, their pitchers will face the same (general) lineups at home and on the road and they'll usually face similar pitching. By using their home and road numbers vs. the same opposition, we're seeing how the park plays in comparison with how it plays against the same competition in other parks.
Thats exactly what I mean... I wouldnt be surprised if you dug deep enough into MLB stats that you might stumble across some information regarding this topic.. With all the press towards the thin-air in Coors, one would start to think that teams have scouting reports on weather conditions all around the country and not just one stadium. Example: Like you mentioned, other parks have unique weather conce