Freddie Freeman or
Matt Olson
1B • Age: 35 Bats: L • Throws: R
Next Season ✓
2025 Projection
BA | R | HR | RBI | SB | OPS |
.314 | 101 | 22 | 91 | 14 | .919 |
Rank (preseason)
Career Stats ✓
Freddie Freeman
AB | BA | OBP | OPS |
7558 |
.300 |
.387 |
.899 |
Last 3 Years
Yr | AB | R | HR | RBI | SB | BA | OBP | OPS |
2022 |
612 |
116 |
21 |
100 |
13 |
.325 |
.407 |
.918 |
2023 |
637 |
130 |
29 |
102 |
23 |
.331 |
.410 |
.977 |
2024 |
542 |
80 |
22 |
89 |
9 |
.282 |
.378 |
.854 |
Key Splits
| AB | BA | OBP | OPS |
home | 3659 | .296 | .384 | .886 |
road | 3899 | .304 | .390 | .910 |
day | 2116 | .302 | .394 | .919 |
night | 5442 | .299 | .385 | .891 |
vs RHP | 5195 | .312 | .403 | .942 |
vs LHP | 2363 | .273 | .352 | .804 |
none on |
4284 |
.283 |
.363 |
.854 |
risp |
913 |
.329 |
.485 |
.997 |
loaded |
141 |
.348 |
.361 |
.964 |
April |
1131 |
.292 |
.385 |
.888 |
May |
1305 |
.297 |
.378 |
.885 |
June |
1166 |
.299 |
.378 |
.908 |
July |
1170 |
.312 |
.397 |
.932 |
Aug |
1375 |
.303 |
.387 |
.892 |
Sept |
1302 |
.300 |
.397 |
.895 |
Who's Better?
DFS Contests
Between Freeman and Olson, for those looking for the best stats today (and for most daily matchups), we generally give the slight edge to Freddie. He's a more consistent hitter and the splits play that out. Possible exceptions to that include when Olson is playing in a day game (.928 OPS vs .821 OPS at night) or when he's going against a pitcher he sees pretty well.
Season-long Rotisserie
Freeman bats in the heart of a better lineup and, overall, has better long-term numbers so there's plenty of reason for his higher draft ranking. Streaks aside, both are perennial all-stars but Freeman is consistently better over the course of a full season and, for good measure, will toss in ~10 steals. The main risk here is injury. Freeman has dealt with a variety of issues over the past year culminating with ankle surgery in Dec 2024. He'll likely be nursing the ankle over the first couple months of the season -- expect a slight drop to his typical numbers during that stretch.
Related
What's your take?