since 2002

Batter vs Pitcher Matchup

Head-to-head comparison of any MLB batter and pitcher since 1950. Search players below and watch their matchup stats update...

Mickey Mantle
Early Wynn
AB153 HR13 OPS.959
Share:copied!

Ownage chart

Mickey Mantle
  • 1.525
    1952
  • 0.553
    1953
  • 0.670
    1954
  • 0.796
    1955
  • 0.996
    1956
  • 1.389
    1957
  • 1.625
    1958
  • 0.229
    1959
  • 1.055
    1960
  • 0.556
    1962
Early Wynn
Note: given a league-wide OPS of ~.725, the closer the line gets to a player, the more ownage. Min of 5 PA in a season to qualify.
Share chart

Matchup Ranks

  • SLG.536 .700
  • Hard Hit1% 30%
  • Quality AB44% 75%
  • SB Success6% 15%

Season stats

Mantle vs Wynn: 11 Seasons
YrPAABH2B3BHRRBIBBSOBAOBPSLGOPS
19521195001121.556.636.8891.525
195322172010257.118.318.235.553
195427203001276.150.370.300.670
195524194101256.211.375.421.796
195625227102426.318.360.636.996
195718124002463.333.556.8331.389
195820166004544.375.5001.1251.625
195918161000026.063.167.063.230
196023154101384.267.522.5331.055
1961432001111.667.7501.6672.417
1962940000050.000.556.000.556
TOTALS201153383113244744.248.423.536.959
Note: OPS color trend requires a min. of 5 PA in a season.

Predicted outcomes

Based on historical data and our prediction model, the probability of various outcomes for a random at-bat (hot streaks aside).

Gets on base (42% OBP)

1B: 12% 2B: 2% 3B: 1% HR: 6% BB: 21% HBP: 0%
1b 2b 3b hr bb hbp

Makes an out (58%)

  • Strikeout: 20%
  • Out (in play): 38%

Latest ABs

Mantle vs Wynn: Last 25 ABs
Date Inn Score Count Result Details Hard hit?
6/7/60 - CHA @ NYA6up 3-2n/a1B to right
7/22/60 - CHA @ NYA1 0-0n/aSO to -
7/22/60 - CHA @ NYA3 2-2n/aBB-
8/23/60 - CHA @ NYA1down 0-3(3 - 0)BB-
8/23/60 - CHA @ NYA4down 0-3(3 - 0)BB-
8/23/60 - CHA @ NYA6down 1-3(1 - 2)SO to -
8/23/60 - CHA @ NYA9down 1-5n/aOutground ball to first
7/13/61 - NYA @ CHA1up 2-0n/aHR home run to deep right
5/28/61 - CHA @ NYA1 0-0(3 - 1)BB-
5/28/61 - CHA @ NYA3down 0-5(3 - 2)SOstrike out-
5/28/61 - CHA @ NYA6down 0-6n/a1B to right
9/23/62 - NYA @ CHA1up 1-0n/aIBB-
9/23/62 - NYA @ CHA3up 1-0n/aOutground ball to second
9/23/62 - NYA @ CHA6up 1-0n/aBB-
9/23/62 - NYA @ CHA8up 1-0n/aBB-
9/23/62 - NYA @ CHA10 1-1n/aBB-
9/28/62 - CHA @ NYA1down 0-2n/aOutfly ball to first
9/28/62 - CHA @ NYA3down 1-2n/aBB-
9/28/62 - CHA @ NYA5down 1-2n/aOutground ball to first
9/28/62 - CHA @ NYA7 3-3n/aOutfly ball to catcher
Matchup Alert (Elites)
Matchup Alert (Elites)
Get the day's best matchups (+ exclusive notes) straight to your inbox! 2-3/wk, unsubscribe anytime.
Please enter your first name.Invalid email - try again.Please enter an email.Thanks! Check your inbox to confirm your email (if you don't spot it, try your junk/promotions folder).

About Ownage charts

Want a quick look at the seasonal trends of a batter/pitcher matchup? Called Ownage Charts, they're a handy way to see which way the trend is headed. On each chart, the closer the OPS line gets to a player's name, the more ownage and bragging rights. For context, there's a horizontal line that denotes the league-wide OPS of about .725. A minimum of 5 plate appearances in a given season is required to qualify for the chart.

More about our philosophy

Baseball's an individual sport with team goals and nothing's a better example of that than an at-bat. A batter could miss a curve by 2 feet then crush a ball 400 feet the very next time up. Most baseball fans (minus degenerate gamblers) love that unpredictability. On the flip side, models can help predict what may happen and we've developed a variety of algorithms that can be applied to head-to-head matchups. Most rely on a fair amount of data but generally do well when there are at least 15 plate appearances.

Most of the tables above break down the actual head-to-head data in a way that's hopefully more digestable and actionable (i.e., helping you decide to sit or start a SP/batter). The "Predicted" table takes into account a whole bunch of data and tosses it into our at-bat predictive model: previous results, ballpark, weather and more. And, of course, the more historical data the tighter the accuracy. We have plans to release even more granular data, but for now, enjoy and let us know if you have any questions or suggestions.

Classic matchups

These are some of our favorite matchups based on length of history, involvement of elite players/HOFs, interesting stat trends and more.